[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the discussion so far
Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit:
> I want generically-named procedures to do the correct generic thing on
> the local system. I want no generically-named procedures mandated by
> the standard when they cannot be implemented correctly on a
> fancy/schmancy system.
There is no "correct generic thing".
> Now if you want, as a system implementor, to continue to implement
> them, go right ahead. But *please* don't force every Scheme system,
> include a fancy/schmancy one, to do so!
Fancy systems are precisely the ones that need both "small, fast, and simple"
and "large, slow, and complex". (These are relative terms.)
You let them out again, Old Man Willow! John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of? You should not be waking! jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eat earth! Dig deep! Drink water! Go to sleep! www.reutershealth.com
Bombadil is talking. www.ccil.org/~cowan