Mail Thread Index
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 99 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 99 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- I would tone down some of the language,
Ray Blaak
- use "rec" instead of "rtd"?,
Ray Blaak
- Initial comments,
Alan Watson
- Why vectors?,
Derick Eddington
- Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec>,
Derick Eddington
- Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields,
Derick Eddington
- Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type?,
Derick Eddington
- Consider a different define-record-type syntax,
Derick Eddington
- Re: Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields,
William D Clinger
- Re: Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type?,
William D Clinger
- Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable,
Derick Eddington
- rtd-constructor and immutable fields,
Arthur Smyles
- Two suggestions about record identity,
Alexey Radul
- ANN: Implementation of draft for Gambit,
Arthur Smyles
- why generative?,
Shiro Kawai
- Revised SRFI 99 ERR5RS Records,
David Van Horn
- Procedural vs. inspection, lists vs. vectors (2 of 3),
John Cowan
- Convenience forms and hygiene (1 of 3),
John Cowan
- Record printing (3 of 3),
John Cowan
Mail converted by MHonArc