Mail Index

• Thread Index

• I would tone down some of the language
  • From: Ray Blaak
• use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: I would tone down some of the language
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  • From: David Van Horn
• Initial comments
  • From: Alan Watson
• Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec>
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Consider a different define-record-type syntax
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Elf
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Physics
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Elf
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Elf
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Elf
• Re: Initial comments
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Clarify mutability of all define-record-type <field spec>
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Description of rtd-mutator does not specify what it does for immutable fields
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Why the inversion of mutability between make-rtd and define-record-type?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Consider a different define-record-type syntax
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Initial comments
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Initial comments
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Per Bothner
• Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable
  • From: Derick Eddington
• Re: Initial comments
  • From: Alan Watson
• Re: Initial comments
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable
  • From: Physics
• rtd-constructor and immutable fields
  • From: Arthur Smyles
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Elf
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Elf
• Two suggestions about record identity
  • From: Alexey Radul
• Re: Two suggestions about record identity
  • From: Ray Blaak
• Re: Why vectors?
  • From: Per Bothner
• ANN: Implementation of draft for Gambit
  • From: Arthur Smyles
• why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Revised SRFI 99 ERR5RS Records
  • From: David Van Horn
• Re: Reference implementation's use of datum->syntax is not portable
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: will
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Andre van Tonder
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: will
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Per Bothner
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: why generative?
  • From: will
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Procedural vs. inspection, lists vs. vectors (2 of 3)
  • From: John Cowan
• Convenience forms and hygiene (1 of 3)
  • From: John Cowan
• Record printing (3 of 3)
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: why generative?
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Convenience forms and hygiene (1 of 3)
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Procedural vs. inspection, lists vs. vectors (2 of 3)
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: Record printing (3 of 3)
  • From: William D Clinger
• Re: why generative?
  • From: Shiro Kawai
• Re: Procedural vs. inspection, lists vs. vectors (2 of 3)
  • From: David Van Horn