[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initial comments
Thanks for your reply, Will.
Systematic use of
the "rtd-" prefix in SRFI 99 prevents clashes with the
names defined by the corresponding layers of the R6RS,
This is not C. We have a module system that allows arbitrary renaming
and prefixing. Or maybe this is C, and you intend this SRFI to be used
in module-less R5RS systems. Ugh. Please wait while I find a peg for
and reduces confusion between SRFI 99 procedures and
those of the R6RS: If a procedure's name begins with
"rtd-", then it is part of the SRFI 99 API, not the
There are two potential sources of confusion: having things that do
the same thing but have slightly different names and having things
that do slightly different things but have the same name. I worry more
about the former and you about the latter. We went through this same
argument with the R6RS fixnum and flonum libraries.
Can you at least rename "rtd-all-field-names" to "rtd-field-names"?
No, the behavior specified by the R6RS is not quite
equivalent to the behavior specified by SRFI 99
Thanks for the explanation of the R6RS oddness.