[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two suggestions about record identity

To: Alexey Radul <axofch@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Two suggestions about record identity
From: Ray Blaak <blaak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:45:10 -0700
Cc: srfi-99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <be5023640808122025o30a2ad9bg7eb97838724a952b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <be5023640808122025o30a2ad9bg7eb97838724a952b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)

Also, please specify (or at least explicitly leave unspecified)
whether two ERR5RS records without fields are eqv?.

I guess this brings up structural vs name equivalence.

I strongly recommend name equivalence so that only records created viathe same constructor are considered equivalent, even if all of thefields are the same.

References:
- Two suggestions about record identity
  - From: Alexey Radul

Prev by Date: Two suggestions about record identity
Next by Date: Re: Why vectors?
Previous by thread: Two suggestions about record identity
Next by thread: ANN: Implementation of draft for Gambit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread