Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Ben Goetter <goetter@mazama.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Ben Goetter <goetter@mazama.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Taylor R. Campbell" <campbell@mumble.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: bear <bear@sonic.net>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro@lava.net>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: bear <bear@sonic.net>
• Re: Issues with Unicode
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: bear <bear@sonic.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Jorgen Schaefer <forcer@forcix.cx>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>