[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 17:54 +0200, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > 1. The correct primitive is READ-CODEPOINT, not READ-CHAR.
> > READ-CHAR is a library routine.
> Unless char is defined to be a code point. Which is IMHO the most
> reasonable choice: code points are the natural atomic units of Unicode
> text, and most Unicode algorithms are expressed in terms of code points.
In many respects I agree that this would be sensible from the
Unfortunately it is quite wrong, which is something that the UNICODE
people go to great lengths to make clear (and, IMO, a serious failing of