[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 91 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 91 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Subject: Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:25:45 -0700
Cc: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>, srfi-91@srfi.schemers.org
Delivered-to: srfi-91@srfi.schemers.org
In-reply-to: <44736BDA.8010705@bothner.com> (Per Bothner's message of "Tue, 23 May 2006 13:08:58 -0700")
References: <443E9048.8000804@mazama.net> <3E48308A-DDE7-4CA3-A497-9D16079F0353@iro.umontreal.ca> <443EF463.6080907@mazama.net> <A58B440E-FFFF-4912-8731-1058B24961A1@iro.umontreal.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0605210717440.14258@bolt.sonic.net> <1148225285.17773.59.camel@vmx.eros-os.org> <87lksvpe4i.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> <1148229386.17773.127.camel@vmx.eros-os.org> <20060523181545.GM2798@ccil.org> <1148409836.10739.80.camel@mikado64.cs.jhu.edu> <44735B18.1070103@bothner.com> <1148413901.10739.87.camel@mikado64.cs.jhu.edu> <44736BDA.8010705@bothner.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

> You're contradicting yourself: I asked about a use-case for *character*
> as a separate *data type*.

Text editors.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>

References:
- Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Ben Goetter <goetter@mazama.net>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Ben Goetter <goetter@mazama.net>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: bear <bear@sonic.net>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <shap@eros-os.org>
- Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
  - From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
Next by Date: Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
Previous by thread: Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
Next by thread: Re: Why are byte ports "ports" as such?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread