[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please direct comments about SRFI 68 to the SRFI 68 mailing list
On May 17, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
I appreciate your naming suggestions, but I'm not going to follow up
on stuff about SRFI 68 on this list.
I'd like to point out that you were the first to violate this rule by
sending to the SRFI 66 mailing list **only** your request for name
suggestions for SRFI 68 procedures. I'm not willing to get dragged
into the SRFI 68 discussion before I have read and reread the proposal
carefully and have a coherent position (my current feeling though is
that SRFI 68 is overly complex).