[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Withdrawal near



This is typical usage in RScheme as well.

(define-class <complex> (<number>)
  real-part
  imag-part)

(make <complex> real-part: 0 imag-part: 1.0)


On 4/12/06, Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Marc Feeley wrote:
> > The record SRFI should not be withdrawn yet because there is a possible
> > interaction with SRFI 88 and SRFI 89 that have just appeared (i.e.
> > Keyword objects and Optional parameters).  I think there are good
> > reasons to consider the use of named optional parameters and keywords in
> > the record SRFI.
>
> For example Kawa allows:
>
> (define-class Complex ()
>    (re) (im))
>
> (define z (Complex im: 3 re: 4))
> --
>         --Per Bothner
> per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/
>
>


--
-- Donovan