[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Withdrawal near

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 76 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 76 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Marc Feeley wrote:
The record SRFI should not be withdrawn yet because there is a possible interaction with SRFI 88 and SRFI 89 that have just appeared (i.e. Keyword objects and Optional parameters). I think there are good reasons to consider the use of named optional parameters and keywords in the record SRFI.

For example Kawa allows:

(define-class Complex ()
  (re) (im))

(define z (Complex im: 3 re: 4))
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/