[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Withdrawal near
Marc Feeley wrote:
The record SRFI should not be withdrawn yet because there is a possible
interaction with SRFI 88 and SRFI 89 that have just appeared (i.e.
Keyword objects and Optional parameters). I think there are good
reasons to consider the use of named optional parameters and keywords in
the record SRFI.
For example Kawa allows:
(define-class Complex ()
(define z (Complex im: 3 re: 4))