[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Withdrawal near

Marc Feeley wrote:
The record SRFI should not be withdrawn yet because there is a possible interaction with SRFI 88 and SRFI 89 that have just appeared (i.e. Keyword objects and Optional parameters). I think there are good reasons to consider the use of named optional parameters and keywords in the record SRFI.

For example Kawa allows:

(define-class Complex ()
  (re) (im))

(define z (Complex im: 3 re: 4))
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/