[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Withdrawal near
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 76 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 76 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Just a wish...
I am increasingly terrified by the complexity
of the proposals that are
meant to fuel the progress of Scheme
as a language, i.e. R6RS.
Please reduce things to the essence
before you decide to extend
the Scheme language itself.
In the case of SRFI 76 this means the
following. You write:
> The explicit-naming syntactic layer
cannot be implemented using syntax-rules alone.
Clearly, this is even more true for
the implicit-naming syntax.
Are the features worth it? Are there
alternatives that would be able to most
of it with plain hygienic macros? Would
that be much of a sacrifice?
(As you might know, I sometimes teach
students "If your extension cannot be
done with procedures and hygienic macros,
it might not be worth doing at all.")