This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 44 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 44 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:49:46PM -0600, scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:35:07PM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote: > > > > No, it's a flaw in the design. You distinguish lists from alists > > according to content. You'll have isomorphism problems whenever the > > content of a list happens to match the structure of an alist. The only > > way to avoid that is to eliminate support for primitive alists -- which > > means eliminating support for one of the most common Scheme collections. Also, you'll notice that we no longer claim compatibility between Scheme alists and the SRFI-44 alist-dicts (one of Shiro's issues that was addressed). Scott
Description: PGP signature