On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:35:07PM -0800, Bradd W. Szonye wrote: > > No, it's a flaw in the design. You distinguish lists from alists > according to content. You'll have isomorphism problems whenever the > content of a list happens to match the structure of an alist. The only > way to avoid that is to eliminate support for primitive alists -- which > means eliminating support for one of the most common Scheme collections. No we don't. Taylor can attest to that. That was a bug in the implementation at the time, it wasn't a problem previous to that version, and isn't a problem now. Scott
Attachment:
pgpV0pjdzO6kl.pgp
Description: PGP signature