Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Existing implementations, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Existing implementations, Lars Thomas Hansen
• LET-VALUES concerns, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LET-VALUES concerns, Lars Thomas Hansen
• why not 3 different SRFIs, Marc Feeley
  • Re: why not 3 different SRFIs, Lars Thomas Hansen
  • Re: why not 3 different SRFIs, Richard Kelsey
• SRFI 11 split into three, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
• Another vote for more parens (re: let-values), erik hilsdale
  • [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), Lars Thomas Hansen
    • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
      • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), Lars Thomas Hansen
        • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
        • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), Dave Mason
          • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), erik hilsdale
            • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), Lars Thomas Hansen
              • Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens), erik hilsdale
• [no subject], Prfnoff
• Final SRFI 11: Syntax for receiving multiple values, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]