Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Existing implementations
  • From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
• LET-VALUES concerns
  • From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
• why not 3 different SRFIs
  • From: Marc Feeley
• Re: why not 3 different SRFIs
  • From: Lars Thomas Hansen
• Re: why not 3 different SRFIs
  • From: Richard Kelsey
• Re: LET-VALUES concerns
  • From: Lars Thomas Hansen
• Re: Existing implementations
  • From: Lars Thomas Hansen
• SRFI 11 split into three
  • From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
• Another vote for more parens (re: let-values)
  • From: erik hilsdale
• [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: Lars Thomas Hansen
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: Lars Thomas Hansen
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: Dave Mason
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: erik hilsdale
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: Lars Thomas Hansen
• Re: [srfi-11] LET-VALUES wrapup (was: Re: Another vote for more parens)
  • From: erik hilsdale
• [no subject]
  • From: Prfnoff
• Final SRFI 11: Syntax for receiving multiple values
  • From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]