[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Please update SRFI-106

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 106 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 106 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On 06/08/2013 22:19, John Cowan wrote:
> 1) Why are there both flag-creating macros and constant variables with
> flag values?  It would seem to be enough to just have one.  Personally I
> favor having the macros, though I can see arguments both ways.
The macros came after the constants and I wanted to hear opinions but unfortunately I haven't heard anything until now. However I think it's nice to have both for people who are familiar with C socket programming and who aren't.

> 2) There is no meaningful support for UDP.  I think a socket API
> shouldn't ignore UDP.
I think POSIX SOCK_DGRAM is for UDP socket (correct me if I'm wrong) and the SRFI is supporting it.

Takashi Kato
E-mail: ktakashi@xxxxxxxxx