[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unbroken naming conventions

At Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:59:03 -0400, David Van Horn wrote:
> Is it important to the implementors that the naming convention avoid 
> such characters?

For PLT Scheme, it doesn't matter much. The current version (to be
released as 4.1) handles such characters in the path conversion by
%-encoding. For example, it maps `(srfi :1)' to