[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unbroken naming conventions

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

At Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:59:03 -0400, David Van Horn wrote:
> Is it important to the implementors that the naming convention avoid 
> such characters?

For PLT Scheme, it doesn't matter much. The current version (to be
released as 4.1) handles such characters in the path conversion by
%-encoding. For example, it maps `(srfi :1)' to