[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unbroken naming conventions

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: unbroken naming conventions
From: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:11:08 -0400
Cc: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1KL9C6-0004yw-3m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1KL9C6-0004yw-3m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)

Thank you for the email, Will. I apologize for this SRFI goingunattended so long.

I will change the naming convention to be compliant with R6RS sinceseveral implementors have expressed the importance of this; the namingconvention is of little use without wide adoption.

Among the workarounds, I have no strong preference. I will go with(srfi :n) unless I hear different preferences from implementors.


David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: unbroken naming conventions
  - From: Matthew Flatt

References:
- unbroken naming conventions
  - From: William D Clinger

Prev by Date: unbroken naming conventions
Next by Date: Re: unbroken naming conventions
Previous by thread: unbroken naming conventions
Next by thread: Re: unbroken naming conventions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread