[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unbroken naming conventions




On Jul 22, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:

No.  Implementations are supposed to handle all valid library names

"supposed to" may not be the right word here.  "expected to" might be
better.


ikarus uses "srfi/%3a1.sls" for srfi 1 while mzscheme uses srfi/% 3A1.sls

That was backwards.