[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unbroken naming conventions

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Jul 22, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:

No.  Implementations are supposed to handle all valid library names

"supposed to" may not be the right word here.  "expected to" might be

ikarus uses "srfi/%3a1.sls" for srfi 1 while mzscheme uses srfi/% 3A1.sls

That was backwards.