Re: Independent optimizing compilation

[Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 19:32 +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:

> Some of these goals conflict, at least among the module systems and
> designs we've looked at, which is why we (eventually) narrowed down
> the list of requirements.  I'll be happy to elaborate, but it's a long
> tortuous story ... :-)

I think this story, and a comparison with existing Scheme module
systems, would be very helpful for understanding the proposal.  At least
the latter belongs in the SRFI document as well.

sam th