[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Bradley Lucier wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 10:08 PM, Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
Its time to wrap up SRFI-70.
I suggest withdrawal. I doubt anyone except you will implement it. I
think it's confused and misguided,
I think there are some good things here, but there may be too much
stuff in one SRFI.
I think extending quotient, remainder, and modulo to real numbers
is a reasonable proposal: There is prior art in both Common Lisp
and some Scheme implementations (including Kawa). However, I think
it's a separate issue from one dealing with infinities.
The round->exact, ceiling->exact, floor->exact, and truncate->exact
may be reasonable assitions (I tend to think so) but again I think
that should be a seperate SRFI.
An SRFI dealing with inexact infinities should I think focus more
on IEEE infinities. It is desirable that a Scheme implementation
can map (possibly compile) Scheme arithmetic on inexact reals into
IEEE floating-point arithmetic. I think more dicussion of this
issue is needed.