[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70

To: srfi-70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
From: Bradley Lucier <lucier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:31:14 -0500
Cc: Bradley Lucier <lucier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: srfi-70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050810030837.1C5711B77B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050810030837.1C5711B77B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


On Aug 9, 2005, at 10:08 PM, Aubrey Jaffer wrote:

Its time to wrap up SRFI-70.

I suggest withdrawal. I doubt anyone except you will implement it.I think it's confused and misguided, and that much of what passed for"discussion" in this SRFI had little or no meaning; after a while Ididn't even understand what people meant by the words they wereusing, so I stopped worrying about it.


Sorry.

Brad

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- Wrapping up SRFI-70
  - From: Aubrey Jaffer

Prev by Date: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Next by Date: Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Previous by thread: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Next by thread: Re: Wrapping up SRFI-70
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread