Re: output streams vs output ports

[Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Taylor Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
>> >                                                Is there a good reason
>> > for having both output streams & output ports?  Was the distinction
>> > perhaps a vestigial one from SML's I/O system (which I haven't
>> > investigated thoroughly)?
>> 
>> That, and the desire to keep the streams and ports layers separate.
>
> But what benefit is achieved by having two identical (ignoring naming)
> layers for output, even if the separation from input streams & input
> ports is useful?

- It would be somewhat strange to have input *ports*, but output
  *streams*.

- The cost is virtually nil.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla