Re: propositions, oppositions, and some minor details

[Andre van Tonder <andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Felix Winkelmann wrote:

> I think `record->sexp' is actually pretty handy (for example for debugging 
> purposes).
> I vehemently suggest to leave it in.

Noted.

> That leads me to another issue: What about separate compilation?
> The problem is here that I might have two source-files, using the
> same record type, compiled separately in two different instances of
> the compiler. How can I make sure that
>
> ; a.scm
>
> (define-record foo ...)
>
> ; b.scm
>
> (define-record foo ...)
>
> Refer to the same type?

Good question.  Hard to answer, though, without a specification of what 
spearate compilation is... :)

Andre