[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fundamental design flaws

> Tom Lord wrote:
>> But since 44 gives no way to create a real set, a conforming
>> implementation can use implementations that just call error.

scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Just because SRFI-44 doesn't specify a set, and doesn't specify
> extensibility doesn't mean that a set cannot be created.

Sorry, but that's *exactly* what it means. With no specification and no
extension mechanism, you cannot make one. That's why we keep telling you
that those things are essential.
Bradd W. Szonye