This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 27 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 27 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Wouldn't it perhaps be better to make "default-random-source" a procedure? This would provide some error-checking in case one assigns a new value. It could behave just like a "parameter" procedure, so (default-random-source) returns the default random source and (default-random-source <source>) sets it to a new value. felix