[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change: MUST support block comment "#|...|#" and datum comment "#; datum"
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 AM, David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I said:
>> > A <i>well-formatted</i> s-expression is an expression interpreted
>> > identically by both traditional s-expressions and by sweet-expressions.
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:14:10 -0400, John Cowan <cowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm not a fan of this term. What about "polyglot" instead? (A document
>> which is both valid HTML and well-formed XML and has the same meaning
>> in both interpretations is called "polyglot HTML".)
> Reusing a term from elsewhere is appealing, but the term "polyglot" itself
> is probably mysterious to most people. And is being "polyglot" a
> *good* thing, or a *bad* thing? That's not obvious either.
> I'm guessing one concern is that "well-formatted" sounds too much
> like "well-formed", which is different. If that's the concern, fair enough.
> So... let's define both "nicely-formatted" and "polyglot",
> as synonyms. Then people can use whichever term they want. E.G.:
> A <i>nicely-formatted</i> (aka <i>polyglot</i>)
I should probably scan through the SRFI and make it
> s-expression is an expression interpreted
> identically by both traditional s-expressions and by sweet-expressions.
> A nicely-formatted file is a file interpreted identically
> by both traditional s-expressions and sweet-expressions.
> I've modified the SRFI-110 draft this way in the git repo, so
> we can see what it looks like.
> --- David A. Wheeler