[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unicode hex representation length restrictions

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 75 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 75 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Unicode hex representation length restrictions
From: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:38:55 -0600
Cc: srfi-75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507121015290.11039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <y9l8y0j80pz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050709002445.C8F721B77B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y9lvf3hu90a.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507111803360.12527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1DsL1S-0005cv-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507120922400.2962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507121015290.11039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

At Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:36:22 -0700 (PDT), bear wrote:
> You should, however, help prevent this kind of
> misunderstanding in the future.  Please explain somewhere
> other than just in the BNF grammar, in English, that the
> choice of escape character determines the length of the
> following hex escape.

Added for the next draft. I also added string examples, which should
have been there in the first place.

Matthew

References:
- Response to SRFI 75.
  - From: bear
- Re: Response to SRFI 75.
  - From: Matthew Flatt
- Unicode hex representation length restrictions
  - From: bear
- Re: Unicode hex representation length restrictions
  - From: bear

Prev by Date: Re: Typos
Next by Date: Re: naming comments
Previous by thread: Re: Unicode hex representation length restrictions
Next by thread: Re: Response to SRFI 75.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread