[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New release of SRFI 117

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 117 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 117 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.



Takashi Kato scripsit:

> Shouldn't `queue?` be `list-queue?`?

Fixed, thanks.

> And is there a reason why there is no `list-queue->list` to
> return newly allocated list? Though, it might be just one liner
> like this:
> 
> (list-copy (list-queue-list q))

Just so.  In general, I tried to avoid adding these one-liners.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@xxxxxxxx
Clear?  Huh!  Why a four-year-old child could understand this report.
Run out and find me a four-year-old child.  I can't make head or tail
out of it.        --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports