[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cleaning up SRFI 105 MUSTard (mostly)

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 105 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 105 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On 09/29/2012 01:42 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
But if I understand your concern correctly, it sounds like you're arguing that bold+caps is too strong.  That's plausible enough.  I worry that <small> is too uncontrolled, no telling what it will do.  I can't predict what future browsers will do with <small>, even if every browser today made me happy.

If we're talking about styling, most SRFIs using the standard SRFI "template" start out all wrong: The big <h1> title is the content-less word "Title" while
the actual title is in a much smaller font. I think this is a flaw in the
SRFI requirements, but it can alleviated with some CSS styling.  For
example like I did in  http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-64/srfi-64.html .

For what it's worth, instead of:


something like this would make more semantic sense:

<h1 id="title">Curly-infix-expressions</h1>

but the SRFI process doesn't allow that.
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/