[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Slowness

To: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Slowness
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr.Preprocessor])
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:38:18 +0200
Cc: srfi-discuss@srfi.schemers.org
Delivered-to: srfi-discuss@srfi.schemers.org
In-reply-to: <slrnbfeiod.6k8.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> (MJ Ray's messageof "Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:46:37 -0000")
References: <3073F179-9D17-11D7-B7C8-00039309311E@evdev.ath.cx><slrnbfeiod.6k8.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.5 (cabbage,berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "MJ" == MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

MJ> Taylor Campbell <campbell@evdev.ath.cx> wrote:
>> I know a module system is going to be very controversial, but the 
>> problem can't be ignored any longer.

MJ> So fix it.  Do syntax-case modules have problems?  Are the problems
MJ> with modules documented?

Richard Kelsey, Matthew Flatt, and I intend to work on the problem in
the foreseeable future.  We've already agreed on substantial basics.
I just need to move one other SRFI from my own queue into draft first
...

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

References:
- Re: Slowness
  - From: Taylor Campbell <campbell@evdev.ath.cx>
- Re: Slowness
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Slowness
Next by Date: SRFI 33 and SRFI dependence
Previous by thread: Re: Slowness
Next by thread: SRFI 33 and SRFI dependence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread