[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: different procedures for different functions
- To: Neil Van Dyke <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: different procedures for different functions
- From: Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva <asandroq@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:24:22 -0300
- Cc: higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx>, srfi-98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: srfi-98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=noDPA76liKAl9npWgDnyFjKGDELjEHPzIi7MLjEkTEY=; b=ENJCQqSrBaFudetoKTZZ7uBhRMqwcZzL3tSjZeiYlAfW4Em/lYYwzuCrKq7XYBQpTK BJ/QCc5zDqZ/nj1V83mW362g61cukS1ely/VqbxpYHwEa/QNbGbgralhmfOyaJZtKG+/ 5L5M9L6scTMHIqqwX99yPvE8mL0UnCs18Oz2I=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iB8TD+bCAXjlqLu5Kj5UcpZYZ559BJSJkDzIyGqtOVqj3kyGAcJmo76CLRWxwudNOE XfOVtwc1mj7FU09eXAZq35Pe1556xX7vq5mP3LDZxGWE/eE56a9HAVE2G25jpQ9jSPT5 TsIH2TDhtMAH56Rb2/AE95aqsLREmSWdC4nI0=
- In-reply-to: <48709EA3.4020208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <f07386410807060251v6676048bi84ca7c9380278ca1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48709EA3.4020208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
Hallo,
Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Or, as long as we're saying "posix", we can just use the Posix names
(I'm not sure all these are strictly Posix):
posix-getenv
posix-environ
posix-putenv
posix-setenv
posix-unsetenv
getenv is ANSI C, besides, Windows has putenv. I guess that using
this POSIX naming scheme will confuse people running a non-POSIX system.
Cheers,
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/