[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
- To: <srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
- From: "leppie" <xacc.ide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:09:04 +0200
- Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:subject :date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=VC79PhSahNMFGfx3cWNoSbHHBDkq2iVnLfNod/ZNjv8=; b=bzvhm9b61lVMva2llpQe/dJnwDXPfnFvYDzjsMVVDRij+NiQwzvqXzfVVALSVn2088 6Urb/NgcLb5U7KHBVSGtvPKhPLuYesQerpm7dZk63CBbLyd5tbOE/Pziy8wSEvEdzxU7 Z7lTbtgFLwUTiPRaahN7B7Dt47IkV16huEm20=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer :x-mimeole; b=jKnAN37a1ov5lVuRDlsF9lOdWu8i/Js2kI8sgq2kT7sGHnfeMb5v1Kighrgld8/7rT FVeMZUfMbcosAAdjRImafFTprDYeeRN0y4XGIYgqG4300AE3GUfpE8q69Oz3Cw7tRz0S 6aFsJ9//exxPQfiXFz8nizeEJxkPzPZJcowTU=
If you are an implementor of an R6RS system I am not aware of, please tell
me about your system and whether you would be willing to support this
SRFI.
Hi
I am from IronScheme (http://codeplex.com/IronScheme).
I support it.
I agree the library to file mapping is another issue.
Cheers
leppie