[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- To: <srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
- From: "leppie" <xacc.ide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:09:04 +0200
- Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:subject :date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=VC79PhSahNMFGfx3cWNoSbHHBDkq2iVnLfNod/ZNjv8=; b=bzvhm9b61lVMva2llpQe/dJnwDXPfnFvYDzjsMVVDRij+NiQwzvqXzfVVALSVn2088 6Urb/NgcLb5U7KHBVSGtvPKhPLuYesQerpm7dZk63CBbLyd5tbOE/Pziy8wSEvEdzxU7 Z7lTbtgFLwUTiPRaahN7B7Dt47IkV16huEm20=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer :x-mimeole; b=jKnAN37a1ov5lVuRDlsF9lOdWu8i/Js2kI8sgq2kT7sGHnfeMb5v1Kighrgld8/7rT FVeMZUfMbcosAAdjRImafFTprDYeeRN0y4XGIYgqG4300AE3GUfpE8q69Oz3Cw7tRz0S 6aFsJ9//exxPQfiXFz8nizeEJxkPzPZJcowTU=
If you are an implementor of an R6RS system I am not aware of, please tell
me about your system and whether you would be willing to support this
I am from IronScheme (http://codeplex.com/IronScheme).
I support it.
I agree the library to file mapping is another issue.