[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS

To: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
From: "Yoshikatsu Fujita" <y.fujita.lwp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:16:50 +0200
Approved: srfi-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f07386410809240134h3edbaef5k1a97b82eb89f66be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48867266.5070502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8F763578-00DA-4E00-BADC-B1860A5D3961@xxxxxxxxx> <f07386410809240134h3edbaef5k1a97b82eb89f66be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b28 (darwin)

I will support it. :-)
Thank you!
---
Yoshikatsu Fujita
Ypsilon (http://code.google.com/p/ypsilon/) developer

References:
- Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: David Van Horn
- Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum
- Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: higepon

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Next by Date: Off-topic, but relevant
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Next by thread: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread