[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
From: "Yoshikatsu Fujita" <y.fujita.lwp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:16:50 +0200
Approved: srfi-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f07386410809240134h3edbaef5k1a97b82eb89f66be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48867266.5070502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8F763578-00DA-4E00-BADC-B1860A5D3961@xxxxxxxxx> <f07386410809240134h3edbaef5k1a97b82eb89f66be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b28 (darwin)

I will support it. :-)
Thank you!
---
Yoshikatsu Fujita
Ypsilon (http://code.google.com/p/ypsilon/) developer

References:
- Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: David Van Horn
- Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum
- Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: higepon

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Next by Date: Off-topic, but relevant
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Next by thread: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread