Re: Unnecessary

[Joo ChurlSoo <init@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

 * From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 | Joo ChurlSoo <init@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
   >> |Why to introduce MU if we already have LIST for packing multiple
   >> |values in a single value?
   >> 
   >> Because decomposition of multiple values of MU is simple and rapid.

 | Decomposition of x when it's a MU:
 |  (x proc)
 | and when it's a list:
 | (apply proc x)
 | for exactly the same proc. The difference doesn't warrant introducing
 | a new sequence type and learning when to use MU and when to use a list.

It depends on users.

-- 
Joo ChurlSoo