[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
* From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
| Joo ChurlSoo <init@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> |Why to introduce MU if we already have LIST for packing multiple
>> |values in a single value?
>> Because decomposition of multiple values of MU is simple and rapid.
| Decomposition of x when it's a MU:
| (x proc)
| and when it's a list:
| (apply proc x)
| for exactly the same proc. The difference doesn't warrant introducing
| a new sequence type and learning when to use MU and when to use a list.
It depends on users.