This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 86 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 86 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
* From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> | Joo ChurlSoo <init@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Although MU* can be substituted for MU and NU, MU* is much slower than MU. | This is not true: it depends on the implementation. | Also the semantics is different: the result of MU evaluates arguments | each time it is unpacked. Are you sure this is what you intended? If MU is defined as a procedure with the same speed or better, I'll use it. -- Joo ChurlSoo