[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: loss of abstraction
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Michael Sperber wrote:
>Andrew Wilcox <awilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> What would you like to be able to do with a syntax object
>> abstraction that you'd not be able to do if you've lost that
> Change its representation.
You are confusing ends with means. Abstraction for the sake of
abstraction is useless. Changing something's representation is not a
worthwhile goal unless you benefit by the change. He asked what
benefits you expect to reap by changing the representation. You have
not answered his question.