# Re: Revision of SRFI 66 available

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 66 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 66 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

There is not much of a rationale... It's just a little personally preference of mine:
I use [x, y] to denote a "closed interval" (i.e. set of all real numbers z, x <= z <= y),
whereas you talk about a finite set (not closed, not dense). [You do, don't you?
Or do the procedures allow 3.4 as index to be rounded to 3?] In addition, I myself
stopped using the notation in standards and the like because in the past I managed
to confuse some of my colleagues with it (in particular some less mathemtically
inclined electrical and mechanical engineers); {a, ..., b} seems to be clear to anyone.
But, as I said, its a minor thing and the intention is clear anyhow.

----
Dr. Sebastian Egner
Senior Scientist Channel Coding & Modulation
Philips Research Laboratories
Prof. Holstlaan 4 (WDC 1-051, 1st floor, room 51)
5656 AA Eindhoven
The Netherlands
tel:       +31 40 27-43166
fax:      +31 40 27-44004
email: sebastian.egner@xxxxxxxxxxx

 srfi-66-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06-06-2005 15:09 To:        Sebastian Egner/EHV/RESEARCH/PHILIPS@PHILIPS         cc:        srfi-66@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx         Subject:        Re: Revision of SRFI 66 available         Classification:

I intend to follow all of your suggestions in the next revision except
one (modulo the naming issue), so I'll just follow up on that single issue:

Sebastian Egner <sebastian.egner@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> 4. Notation "range [0, 255]" and "indices [source-start, source-start +
> n)":
> How about "{0, ..., 255}" and "{source-start, ..., source-start + n - 1}"?

The rationale for this isn't clear to me---[x, y] is standard high
school notation (at least in the US and Germany) for inclusive ranges,
similarly for [x, y), which is inclusive on the left-hand side, and
exclusive on the right-hand side.  I could probably be persuaded to
use inclusive intervals everywhere, but it isn't clear to me that this
would be an improvement.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla