[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
At this point I have only one question: For a rank-5
array, why #5A(...) instead of #A5(...)?
Maybe #A5 is marginally better, but I think compatibility
with the prior art of Common Lisp argues for #5A. That's
not an overwheming argument, but (I think) tips the scales
in favor of #5A.
More technical argument: What happens with a rank-0 array?
In APL this is equivalent to a scalar, and in any case a
rank-0 array has a single element. Given the choice
between #A0XXX and #0AXXX, the latter is better since the
former leads to ambiguities.
I'm thinking about parsers here, where it's easier on
everybody if tokens differ as soon as possible.
A (non-human) parser handles either just fine - except
for the degenerate rank-0 case.