[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bytes vs. octets

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 56 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 56 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bytes vs. octets
From: Alex Shinn <foof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:17:10 -0500
Cc: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409150923490.19613@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <867jqvsy7m.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409150923490.19613@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT), bear wrote:
> 
> Okay... but at least document that you mean 8-bit units, not the
> distance between adjacent unique memory addresses.

It is already so documented.

-- 
Alex

References:
- bytes vs. octets
  - From: Alex Shinn
- Re: bytes vs. octets
  - From: bear

Prev by Date: Re: bytes vs. octets
Next by Date: Re: bytes vs. octets
Previous by thread: Re: bytes vs. octets
Next by thread: Re: bytes vs. octets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread