[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bytes vs. octets

To: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bytes vs. octets
From: Alex Shinn <foof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:17:10 -0500
Cc: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409150923490.19613@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <867jqvsy7m.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409150923490.19613@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT), bear wrote:
> 
> Okay... but at least document that you mean 8-bit units, not the
> distance between adjacent unique memory addresses.

It is already so documented.

-- 
Alex

References:
- bytes vs. octets
  - From: Alex Shinn
- Re: bytes vs. octets
  - From: bear

Prev by Date: Re: bytes vs. octets
Next by Date: Re: bytes vs. octets
Previous by thread: Re: bytes vs. octets
Next by thread: Re: bytes vs. octets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread