[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bytes vs. octets

Alex Shinn <foof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've given it a lot of thought and have decided to stick to *-byte in
> the names as there is simply no advantage in changing to octet.  In
> this day and age "byte" is universally accepted as being 8 bits and
> any argument that it could be misinterpreted is simply not
> realistic.

What do you mean my "universally accepted", given that you have seen
it not accepted on this very list?