This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 47 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 47 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
| X-Originating-IP: [184.108.40.206] | Old-Return-Path: <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | From: Taylor Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:06:29 -0500 | Resent-From: srfi-47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | X-Mailing-List: <srfi-47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/28 | X-Loop: srfi-47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Resent-Sender: srfi-47-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | | On Jan 5, 2004, at 2:15 PM, Aubrey Jaffer wrote: | | > | From: Taylor Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | > | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:07:43 -0500 | > | | > | Why was the constructor renamed to CREATE-ARRAY? | > | > So that it won't conflict with SRFI-25. | | But ARRAY-SET! et alia conflict, too. The argument you give for | that, 'just use type dispatch,' works for MAKE-ARRAY, too. Excellent point! I will restore the make-array name and put this paragraph in the Issues section: The make-array arguments are different from the same-named procedure in SRFI-25. Type dispatch on the first argument to make-array could support both SRFIs simultaneously.