Re: SRFI-47 -- types and declarations.

[Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "Aubrey" == Aubrey Jaffer <agj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Aubrey> If one can't model on extant SRFIs, then the SRFI process has
Aubrey> failed.

Oh, puh-lease.

Aubrey> How was I supposed to discover that there are good SRFIs and bad
Aubrey> SRFIs?  The SRFI-4 "Post-Finalization Discussion Archive" is empty of
Aubrey> content.

Because this was discussed already in the pre-finalization discussion
archive---right as the first item, in fact.

You could also check the "implementation" list which shows that the
number of Scheme systems supporting SRFI 4 isn't exactly long.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla