This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 44 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 44 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
scgmille@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Yes, [*-functions] are supposed to be polymorphic. This is stated at > the end of the text in the Procedures section: > > Encountering * as a function argument indicates that the argument > must be a collection of the type the function is defined for, or > any sub-type. OK, I thought that's what it meant. Regarding my confusion about VALUES returns: > I think the current form is sufficient, but I'll add a sentence > clarifiying that multiple items on the right of => imply the return of > multiple values. That would be sufficient. Thanks! -- Bradd W. Szonye http://www.szonye.com/bradd