[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: option vs. make-option

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 37 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 37 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Anthony Carrico <acarrico@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: option vs. make-option
From: felix <felixundduni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:28:33 +0100
Cc: srfi-37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210291025080.3856-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

Anthony Carrico wrote:

Should the option constructor be "option" as in the draft or
"make-option".


I'd say `make-option' is more Schemely. On the other hand
`option' is shorter, and a complex command-line interface
might easily have many of those.


cheers,
felix

Follow-Ups:
- Re: option vs. make-option
  - From: Anthony Carrico

References:
- option vs. make-option
  - From: Anthony Carrico

Prev by Date: option vs. make-option
Next by Date: Re: eq? vs. equal?
Previous by thread: option vs. make-option
Next by thread: Re: option vs. make-option
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread