[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: eq? vs. equal?

To: Anthony Carrico <acarrico@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: eq? vs. equal?
From: felix <felixundduni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:32:36 +0100
Cc: srfi-37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210291023140.3856-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

Anthony Carrico wrote:

From the ISSUES section of the draft:


"Should the NAME argument of an option-processor be eq? or equal? to one
of the OPTION's option-names."


If I understand the code correctly, the NAME may be a string, right?
So eq? won't suffice.


cheers,
felix

Follow-Ups:
- Re: eq? vs. equal?
  - From: Anthony Carrico

References:
- eq? vs. equal?
  - From: Anthony Carrico

Prev by Date: Re: option vs. make-option
Next by Date: Re: eq? vs. equal?
Previous by thread: eq? vs. equal?
Next by thread: Re: eq? vs. equal?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread