This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 33 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 33 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Looking over the discussion archive, my impression is that > the bitwise-operations were built on too many assumptions > about integer length and representation, and it was withdrawn > for revisions - basically, people may be looking for a design > that makes it easier to support without constraining how > people represent numbers. Bitwise operations are very important. They should not be coupled to integers, at all. One should think of them as arrays of bits, and treat them as a separate type. (Of course, it's nice to provide a conversion function that turns an int into a bitarray, and vice versa.) Thomas