This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 26 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 26 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
>>>>> "WP" == Walter C Pelissero <walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: WP> The sense of my previous message is: IMHO, SRFI-26 is not general WP> enough and introduces a negligible improvement over standard WP> Scheme. I did a quick grep and subsequent analysis of all calls to MAP and FOR-EACH in the current development version of Lula, which is about 15000 lines of code. There are more than 80 partial calls to MAP and FOR-EACH which take abstraction operands which are merely specialized calls to other procedures. All of them fit the pattern of SRFI 26. On every one of them, I wanted to use something like SRFI 26 while I was writing the code. I conjecture there is still a number of other calls which would benefit from SRFI 26. So this particular application would benefit from SRFI 26 roughly every 200 lines of code. I don't think that's too bad. -- Cheers =8-} M. Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla