[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how useful are collecting lists?
> > Hmm. If that's a *problem*, one solution without significantly changing
> > the existing semantics might be to allow <*...*> after ".".
Alan Manuel Gloria <almkglor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ara ara, I thought this was *already* allowed...
Actually, they weren't. I was trying to be picky about what's allowed after "." (e.g., I don't think "$" and "\\" are sensible), and obviously was *too* picky. You're absolutely right, that should be permitted.
So this is an important tip, we need to allow this case. I've changed the BNF and Scheme implementation so that a collecting list is legal after the dot in "rest". Thus, this is now legal:
define x . <*
! define y 5
! define z 6
I haven't modified "head", so if "." is the first atom on a line, a collecting list currently can't follow. I can't figure out why you'd want to do that, I'd expect a user to just use a collecting list in that case.
So we already have an important comment (from David Vanderson) that's pointed out a problem, and I've posted a possible solution (one that I hope others will agree is sensible). Excellent! Seems to me that's why we have a SRFI process...
--- David A. Wheeler